Back to insights

Salesforce daily archive

730 days of practical thinking.

One retrospective note for every day from 2 September 2024 to 1 September 2026.

Archive dates organise the subject history. They do not claim the notes were originally published on those dates.

Showing 226 archive entries

Page 2 of 10

Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Data virtualisation

External data can sometimes remain in its source while Salesforce presents it at the point of work. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Transaction boundaries

Cross-system work cannot rely on one database transaction to guarantee an all-or-nothing outcome. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Idempotent integrations

A request may be delivered more than once; a dependable receiver must make repetition safe. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Error recovery

Failure handling is part of the business process, not a technical appendix added after the happy path. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: API boundaries

An API should expose a stable business capability rather than mirror a database or a single user interface. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Customer identity across systems

Identity resolution is the foundation of a coherent customer view across Salesforce and connected platforms. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Master data decisions

A connected estate needs a clear answer to which system is authoritative for each important business fact. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Event-driven Salesforce

Events allow systems to announce meaningful change without controlling every downstream reaction. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Synchronous or asynchronous

Timing is an architectural decision: a process should wait only when the immediate response genuinely changes the next action. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Release-ready engineering: Integration ownership

Every integration needs an explicit owner for its business contract, data meaning and operational health. This retrospective daily note considers how the capability will be tested against seasonal platform change.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Integration observability

A connected process needs end-to-end visibility across platform and team boundaries. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Platform limits as architecture

Governor limits encourage efficient multi-tenant design and must influence architecture from the beginning. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Data virtualisation

External data can sometimes remain in its source while Salesforce presents it at the point of work. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Transaction boundaries

Cross-system work cannot rely on one database transaction to guarantee an all-or-nothing outcome. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Idempotent integrations

A request may be delivered more than once; a dependable receiver must make repetition safe. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Error recovery

Failure handling is part of the business process, not a technical appendix added after the happy path. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: API boundaries

An API should expose a stable business capability rather than mirror a database or a single user interface. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Customer identity across systems

Identity resolution is the foundation of a coherent customer view across Salesforce and connected platforms. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Master data decisions

A connected estate needs a clear answer to which system is authoritative for each important business fact. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Event-driven Salesforce

Events allow systems to announce meaningful change without controlling every downstream reaction. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Synchronous or asynchronous

Timing is an architectural decision: a process should wait only when the immediate response genuinely changes the next action. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Protecting the data contract: Integration ownership

Every integration needs an explicit owner for its business contract, data meaning and operational health. This retrospective daily note considers how meaning, validation and change control keep producers and consumers aligned.

Read daily note
Architecture

Observability before production: Integration observability

A connected process needs end-to-end visibility across platform and team boundaries. This retrospective daily note considers the signals and context required to support the capability once it is live.

Read daily note
Architecture

Observability before production: Platform limits as architecture

Governor limits encourage efficient multi-tenant design and must influence architecture from the beginning. This retrospective daily note considers the signals and context required to support the capability once it is live.

Read daily note